-
#1
*topic*
i cannot find any drivers for my cpu and motherboard.. not sure which motherboard i’ve got. i only know the cpu.. and there are no drivers for it since im using windows 7 32-bit..
pc is working so slowly, even after a fresh re-install.
what do i do?
-
#2
Hmmm windows 7 should work on most newer CPUs, I even think when it was first released a person managed to install win7 on a Pentium II 200Mhz machines with 128MB Sdram without problems.
The motherboard is the other issue, you may need to open the case and take the model number down then post it here. Also post a Screenshot of your device manager with the audio/video/Network tabs open.
-
#3
the CPU is definitly supported by windows 7, the motherboard chipset maynot…
-
#4
ok.. i did try to look around, but i did not see any model number except for ‘N1996’ on the motherboard… i also found a barcode with only numbers on it: 5311199084 — nothing else..
heres the screenshot: http://bildr.no/view/1132507
does that say anything..?
-
#5
Can you give use a pic of the motherboard? Will research for you some later on when im not afk.
-
#7
U think everest will have that info? Btw if i were u id take the machine apart n look closley at the motherboards front and back face for a make n model
-
#8
Try CPU-z
Norton
Moderator — Returning from the Darkness
-
#9
Make and model is probably between the slots in the board… you may have to pull the video card to get a good look at it
-
#10
Ok his board i believe is from msi as oem for hp/compaq/emachines
-
#11
If you could just figure out what the NB chipset is? VIA kt266a, kt333, kt400, kt600 or Nvidia nforce, nforce 2?
-
#12
You have nothing to lose. Just install them! Windows 7 is having drivers for older hardware. I have install them on a single core Pentium 4 with no problems.
-
#13
Ok his board i believe is from msi as oem for hp/compaq/emachines
Yup. That’s what it is alright. And pretty sure all socket a MSI boards used via UNLESS it had onboard graphics.
-
#16
certainly is a MSI OEM board
-
#17
Try this DriverPack Solution. See if it can find your drivers. Download the Full version.
Edit: You have to download it via torrent. It’s completely legitimate.
-
#18
there is no Win 7 drivers for that board, but there are Win Vista Drivers for that board, Win Vista drivers are the closest to Win 7 than XP is for the driver model.
go to viaarena for the drivers needed
-
#19
Hmmm windows 7 should work on most newer CPUs, I even think when it was first released a person managed to install win7 on a Pentium II 200Mhz machines with 128MB Sdram without problems.
Yeah! installed without problem maybe but it will run really slow specially after you installed a few software like AV & such…
*topic*
i cannot find any drivers for my cpu and motherboard.. not sure which motherboard i’ve got. i only know the cpu.. and there are no drivers for it since im using windows 7 32-bit..
pc is working so slowly, even after a fresh re-install.
what do i do?
What type of HDD are you using?
How much ram do you have on the PC?
Anything under 2 GB of ram it’s gona be slow for win7 after just a few software installed
Don’t know what you are using your PC for but the best OS for this «oldies» would be XP
-
#20
you are right.. i’d better install windows xp for this pc.. will probably work way better.
at first, it worked nicely, but now it’s slowing down. like…when i start a program, it seems like it is lagging or something.
my pc got 2MB ram, yes. and it is using win7 32-bit.
so, i will try and update the drivers first and if that does not help, i will just install windows xp, righto?
-
#21
you are right.. i’d better install windows xp for this pc.. will probably work way better.
at first, it worked nicely, but now it’s slowing down. like…when i start a program, it seems like it is lagging or something.
my pc got 2MB ram, yes. and it is using win7 32-bit.
so, i will try and update the drivers first and if that does not help, i will just install windows xp, righto?
I would suggest getting the viaarena driver pack for your chipset which has 4 in 1 driver for Vista.
It Seems 95Vipr has the right specs for the motherboard to get all proper drivers for that motherboard but I believe the driver via has includes what you need other than the video card
-
#22
windows 7 actually works better than xp for my old athlon xp machines.
and yeah vista drivers will work fine for windows 7 so I’d personally go that route. windows xp wasn’t very good at resource management.
-
#23
windows 7 actually works better than xp for my old athlon xp machines.
and yeah vista drivers will work fine for windows 7 so I’d personally go that route. windows xp wasn’t very good at resource management.
Course the os was engineered to be speedy on any hardware just about. Vista had too much overhead.
-
#24
I cannot seem to find the proper link to that 4 in 1 drivers you mention, eidairaman! And should i download the vista version or the windows 7 version of it?
50356
Views
25
Replies
21
Participants
Last post by
paulerxx,
Do you guys think Windows 7 would run ok on an old Athlon XP system I’ve got laying around? Here’s the specs (if I can remember them properly):
Athlon XP 1800+ (1.53ghz)
768MB DDR
20.0 GB HDD
NVIDIA MX400 video card
Some random AMD motherboard
Also, is the beta still available for download?
Give it a try?
The win 7 RC (release candidate) has been released to the public.
With a 20gb Hard drive, would there be a great point in getting it? Considering that it takes up over 10gb, there’s over half your storage space gone.
And i heard it recommends atleast 1gb RAM.
I’d say no it won’t run properly.
Why would you want to. As slow as that PC is you want XP to get max performance out of it and if you do install W7 memory is going to be a problem.
Windows 7 recommended hardware specifications Processor speed 1 GHz processor (32- or 64-bit)
Memory (RAM) 1 GB of RAM (32-bit); 2 GB of RAM (64-bit)
Graphics card Support for DirectX 9 graphics device with 128MB of memory (for Aero)
HDD free space 16 GB of available disk space (32-bit); 20 GB of available disk space (64-bit)
Download : http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win…/download.aspx
What will the machine be used for?
It would probably work, but not great. I would put XP or Linux on it.
if it’s just sitting around not being used, why the hell not and report back?
Quote:
Do you guys think Windows 7 would run ok on an old Athlon XP system I’ve got laying around? Here’s the specs (if I can remember them properly):
Athlon XP 1800+ (1.53ghz)
768MB DDR
20.0 GB HDD
NVIDIA MX400 video card
Some random AMD motherboard
Also, is the beta still available for download?
Aww that makes me nostalgic. The first computer I bought was an Athlon xp 2000+ with 512ram and an Nvidia MX400 gpu. I got fried 3 years ago .
Windows 7 should run on it, just don’t expect miracles.
See less
See more
1
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo
What will the machine be used for?
For trying out Windows 7, since I’m sick of messing with my sig rig boot settings at this point. Had linux screw everything up when I tried to triple boot and I’m still sore over that, so I’m just sticking with a single OS per machine for now.
So memory will be a problem then? Hmmmm… and no Aero either. I have a 60GB hdd I can throw in there, but if the 20GB will work, I may as well just use that…
Maybe I’ll give it a try just to see how well it runs slightly below hardware requirements.
EDIT: Also, anyone have a linky to the download? I’m too lazy to go find it…
See less
See more
4
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRHANDS
if it’s just sitting around not being used, why the hell not and report back?
Yes — if you don’t need the HDD space I’d try it — you may be pleasantly suprised
See less
See more
2
Quote:
Do you guys think Windows 7 would run ok on an old Athlon XP system I’ve got laying around? Here’s the specs (if I can remember them properly):
Athlon XP 1800+ (1.53ghz)
768MB DDR
20.0 GB HDD
NVIDIA MX400 video card
Some random AMD motherboard
Also, is the beta still available for download?
It should run ok. It might be alittle sluggish, but you should have no problem getting it to run.
See less
See more
1
I would definitely go for an athlon…
its a masterpiece. Cuz its have all the properties over the win 7, its boot time is quicker than win 7
wht u say?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayu0203
I would definitely go for an athlon…
its a masterpiece. Cuz its have all the properties over the win 7, its boot time is quicker than win 7
wht u say?
Athlon has better boot time than W7, and has all the «properties over win 7»? WTH?
See less
See more
2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayu0203
I would definitely go for an athlon…
its a masterpiece. Cuz its have all the properties over the win 7, its boot time is quicker than win 7
wht u say?
What are you talking about?
Are you under the understanding that Windows 7 is a CPU?
It isn’t it’s an Operating system.
See less
See more
3
^^Obvious bot is obvious?
OnTopic: Your rig reminds me of the one I have sat in a cupboard. It’ll run, hopefully better than XP on lappys with 224MB RAM.
Quote:
Quote:
Guys, it’s a spambot. Look at the links in his sig, just report please…
On-topic:
Let me know how it works out, I also have an old Athlon 2400+ (2.0Ghz) with 1.5GB ram and 80GB HDD, wondering if it will run Windows 7 as well.
Edit: ah the links have been removed by the looks of it
See less
See more
6
Alright, just ran into a rather significant problem… I haz no IDE DVD drives!!
Was thinking about just using my USB stick, but I’m not sure if such an old motherboard would support booting off a USB drive… what do you guys think?
See less
See more
1
im actually going to see how it runs on my old computer, semp 2800+ @ 2.2ghz, 1.5 gb ram, x850xt, 120gb hdd. ill post back in a bit.
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Guest
Guest
-
#1
I have had this Asus A7n8x-x MB for several months now running an AMD
Athlon XP 2200+ (1.8 ghz CPU) not overclocked in any way. I just
received an AMD XP 3200+ CPU and I was trying to find some resource on
the web to tell me the exact MB settings I should change for this CPU.
If I just put it in the machine, it detects as an AMD Athlon XP 1100+
with the multiplier set in BIOS to 100. If I change it to 133, it
displays 1900+ and 166 displays it as a 2500+ cpu…if I set it to 200
the system will not boot (until I power it completely off, then the
ASUS safe mode tells me that the CPU is set incorrectly and to go in
and change it.
I had hoped for some paper to come with my xp 3200+ to allow me to set
this BIOS correctly. Any help is greatly appreciated!
Oh and I am running the latest version of the BIOS available from the
ASUS UPDATE utility.
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Guest
Guest
-
#2
I also noticed (after reading some other posts here) that I should set
the CPU speed to 200 and leave the memory speed for SPD instead of
AUTO. When I do this, the machine will post as an AMD Athlon XP 3200+
CPU…but the system only gets as far as to the bar across the bottom
for Windows XP initial startup…then it seems to hang, my HD light
comes on for about 20 seconds, and my machine power off. If I turn it
back on once, it powers off again, but a 3rd time and it comes up and
tells me that system is not set correctly and loads bios fail safe
settings. If I leave it underclocked to a 1.1 (11 x 100) it
works…but only enough for me to get here and post
Should I also consider replacing my RAM too? The RAM I have now
(unknown brand) but is 2 sticks of 512mb (identical to each other)
which report the SPD speed at 166. Anything else I should look for or
consider running or upgrading would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:07:37 -0400, Information Scavenger
<likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote:
>I have had this Asus A7n8x-x MB for several months now running an AMD
>Athlon XP 2200+ (1.8 ghz CPU) not overclocked in any way. I just
>received an AMD XP 3200+ CPU and I was trying to find some resource on
>the web to tell me the exact MB settings I should change for this CPU.
>If I just put it in the machine, it detects as an AMD Athlon XP 1100+
>with the multiplier set in BIOS to 100. If I change it to 133, it
>displays 1900+ and 166 displays it as a 2500+ cpu…if I set it to 200
>the system will not boot (until I power it completely off, then the
>ASUS safe mode tells me that the CPU is set incorrectly and to go in
>and change it.
>
>I had hoped for some paper to come with my xp 3200+ to allow me to set
>this BIOS correctly. Any help is greatly appreciated!
>
>Oh and I am running the latest version of the BIOS available from the
>ASUS UPDATE utility.
>
>
>—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
>—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
-
- Mar 30, 2004
-
- 373
-
- 0
-
- 18,780
-
#3
what RAM do you have?..PC2100,PC2700 or PC3200?..have you run memtest to
check if the ram is any good?
Guest
Guest
-
#4
The RAM I have is PC2100. Like I said in the initial post, I have 2
identical chips (512mb each) but I don’t recall the brand name. I
have had them for quite some time, and they worked in this same system
with an XP 2200+ (1.8 cpu). The only thing different now is my CPU is
now a 3200+. I would like to have PC3200 and was thinking of getting
that next anyway…the problems I am having could be resolved if I
just upgrade the RAM. No I have not run any MEMTEST or anything…if
you would tell me where I could get such a utility, I’d gladly run it
but like I said I’ve had the ram for almost a year and have not had
any problems. I’d look and see exactly what brand they are, but they
have ram heat syncs on them and I am not sure how to remove it.
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:03:29 -0400, «dino» <whyme@help.com> wrote:
>what RAM do you have?..PC2100,PC2700 or PC3200?..have you run memtest to
>check if the ram is any good?
>
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
-
- Mar 30, 2004
-
- 373
-
- 0
-
- 18,780
-
#5
well to run an XP3200..you have the wrong ram..PC2100 is 133 .so you are
overclocking your memory by 67 mhz trying to run the CPU..not good. You need
PC3200 for that ..other than that the max you can run is 133 x 11= 1463
MHZ.So you need that mem upgrade soon.
Guest
Guest
-
#6
Ok thanks…I had a pretty good suspicion that had something to do
with it…I am currently running at 1100 which I will continue to run
at until my new ram gets here Thanks!
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:40:57 -0400, «dino» <whyme@help.com> wrote:
>well to run an XP3200..you have the wrong ram..PC2100 is 133 .so you are
>overclocking your memory by 67 mhz trying to run the CPU..not good. You need
>PC3200 for that ..other than that the max you can run is 133 x 11= 1463
>MHZ.So you need that mem upgrade soon.
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Guest
Guest
-
#7
The CPU is actually supposed to be a 3200+ which is supposed to run at
200fsb … I will try tomorrow to set it to 166 and see if it runs as
a 2500+ more stable … if it does run at that and seems stable I’ll
take the CPU out and carefully remove the heat compound and see if it
could be one of these falsely labled chips…
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:29:18 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
wrote:
>ur FSB to 166 as this CPU expects and you should see it as a
>2500+ running 1.833GHz.
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
-
#8
Perchance, did you get this CPU on Ebay. I see at least one guy advertising
a 3200+ in his title line and at the top of his description. But later in
the description he makes it clear that he’s actually selling a 2500+ which
has been tested to run as a 3200+.
Here’s a perfect example:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=44935&item=6718137950&rd=1
«Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
newsd9eo0tqh1d0jgvisvumgotjc7gtujb1eh@4ax.com…
> The CPU is actually supposed to be a 3200+ which is supposed to run at
> 200fsb … I will try tomorrow to set it to 166 and see if it runs as
> a 2500+ more stable … if it does run at that and seems stable I’ll
> take the CPU out and carefully remove the heat compound and see if it
> could be one of these falsely labled chips…
>
> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:29:18 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>ur FSB to 166 as this CPU expects and you should see it as a
>>2500+ running 1.833GHz.
>
>
>
> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==—-
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
> Newsgroups
> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Guest
Guest
-
#9
I got this CPU from partspc.com — a company I saw from a link on
pricewatch.com — the invoice says (for that entry)
AMD Athlon XP 3200+ 400fsb Processor
Interestingly, when I set it to 166 and it detects as a 2500+ it seems
to work fine (my system) so I suspect it is indeed a 2500+ cpu that
was sent to me. I don’t have time to take it apart now, so I will do
that when I get home and investigate the actual label itself.
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:09:55 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
wrote:
>Perchance, did you get this CPU on Ebay. I see at least one guy advertising
>a 3200+ in his title line and at the top of his description. But later in
>the description he makes it clear that he’s actually selling a 2500+ which
>has been tested to run as a 3200+.
>
>Here’s a perfect example:
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=44935&item=6718137950&rd=1
>
>»Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
>newsd9eo0tqh1d0jgvisvumgotjc7gtujb1eh@4ax.com…
>> The CPU is actually supposed to be a 3200+ which is supposed to run at
>> 200fsb … I will try tomorrow to set it to 166 and see if it runs as
>> a 2500+ more stable … if it does run at that and seems stable I’ll
>> take the CPU out and carefully remove the heat compound and see if it
>> could be one of these falsely labled chips…
>>
>> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:29:18 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>ur FSB to 166 as this CPU expects and you should see it as a
>>>2500+ running 1.833GHz.
>>
>>
>>
>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>> News==—-
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>> Newsgroups
>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
-
#10
It’s very interesting that they’ve «erased» most of the label that would
show the actual chip identification. has anybody ever seen an Athlon CPU
with the top line half blank and the bottom two lines missing altogether?
It will be interesting to see what you find when you pull it and take a
look.
Since low-cost newegg.com has the 3200+ OEM for $171, I bet you got scammed
: (
«Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
news:9ujfo09f6vvolbhgskjnadiorvti6imsgu@4ax.com…
>I got this CPU from partspc.com — a company I saw from a link on
> pricewatch.com — the invoice says (for that entry)
>
> AMD Athlon XP 3200+ 400fsb Processor
>
> Interestingly, when I set it to 166 and it detects as a 2500+ it seems
> to work fine (my system) so I suspect it is indeed a 2500+ cpu that
> was sent to me. I don’t have time to take it apart now, so I will do
> that when I get home and investigate the actual label itself.
>
> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:09:55 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Perchance, did you get this CPU on Ebay. I see at least one guy
>>advertising
>>a 3200+ in his title line and at the top of his description. But later in
>>the description he makes it clear that he’s actually selling a 2500+ which
>>has been tested to run as a 3200+.
>>
>>Here’s a perfect example:
>>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=44935&item=6718137950&rd=1
>>
>>»Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
>>newsd9eo0tqh1d0jgvisvumgotjc7gtujb1eh@4ax.com…
>>> The CPU is actually supposed to be a 3200+ which is supposed to run at
>>> 200fsb … I will try tomorrow to set it to 166 and see if it runs as
>>> a 2500+ more stable … if it does run at that and seems stable I’ll
>>> take the CPU out and carefully remove the heat compound and see if it
>>> could be one of these falsely labled chips…
>>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:29:18 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>ur FSB to 166 as this CPU expects and you should see it as a
>>>>2500+ running 1.833GHz.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>>> News==—-
>>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>>> Newsgroups
>>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>>
>
>
>
> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==—-
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
> Newsgroups
> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
-
#11
The plot thickens. I sent PartsPC an email noting that the picture of the
so-called 3200+ on their site had the bottom two lines of the identification
label blanked out. I asked them why and if this was actually a 2500+.
Their reply: «Picutre (sic) may not be exactly as shown — Possibly yes»
Sounds like blatant fraud to me.
«DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ixQhd.288178$wV.217165@attbi_s54…
> It’s very interesting that they’ve «erased» most of the label that would
> show the actual chip identification. has anybody ever seen an Athlon CPU
> with the top line half blank and the bottom two lines missing altogether?
> It will be interesting to see what you find when you pull it and take a
> look.
>
> Since low-cost newegg.com has the 3200+ OEM for $171, I bet you got
> scammed : (
>
>
> «Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
> news:9ujfo09f6vvolbhgskjnadiorvti6imsgu@4ax.com…
>>I got this CPU from partspc.com — a company I saw from a link on
>> pricewatch.com — the invoice says (for that entry)
>>
>> AMD Athlon XP 3200+ 400fsb Processor
>>
>> Interestingly, when I set it to 166 and it detects as a 2500+ it seems
>> to work fine (my system) so I suspect it is indeed a 2500+ cpu that
>> was sent to me. I don’t have time to take it apart now, so I will do
>> that when I get home and investigate the actual label itself.
>>
>> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:09:55 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Perchance, did you get this CPU on Ebay. I see at least one guy
>>>advertising
>>>a 3200+ in his title line and at the top of his description. But later
>>>in
>>>the description he makes it clear that he’s actually selling a 2500+
>>>which
>>>has been tested to run as a 3200+.
>>>
>>>Here’s a perfect example:
>>>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=44935&item=6718137950&rd=1
>>>
>>>»Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
>>>newsd9eo0tqh1d0jgvisvumgotjc7gtujb1eh@4ax.com…
>>>> The CPU is actually supposed to be a 3200+ which is supposed to run at
>>>> 200fsb … I will try tomorrow to set it to 166 and see if it runs as
>>>> a 2500+ more stable … if it does run at that and seems stable I’ll
>>>> take the CPU out and carefully remove the heat compound and see if it
>>>> could be one of these falsely labled chips…
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:29:18 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>ur FSB to 166 as this CPU expects and you should see it as a
>>>>>2500+ running 1.833GHz.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>>>> News==—-
>>>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>>>> >100,000
>>>> Newsgroups
>>>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>> News==—-
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>> Newsgroups
>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>
>
Guest
Guest
-
#12
I am not 100% sure what the chip is supposed to look like. I haven’t
taken it apart yet (will in a couple hrs) but is there a link to a
good picture you could direct me to so I can compare once I get it
out?
Thanks for all the help so far…I really appreciate it.
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 20:12:44 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
wrote:
>The plot thickens. I sent PartsPC an email noting that the picture of the
>so-called 3200+ on their site had the bottom two lines of the identification
>label blanked out. I asked them why and if this was actually a 2500+.
>
>Their reply: «Picutre (sic) may not be exactly as shown — Possibly yes»
>
>Sounds like blatant fraud to me.
>
>»DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:ixQhd.288178$wV.217165@attbi_s54…
>> It’s very interesting that they’ve «erased» most of the label that would
>> show the actual chip identification. has anybody ever seen an Athlon CPU
>> with the top line half blank and the bottom two lines missing altogether?
>> It will be interesting to see what you find when you pull it and take a
>> look.
>>
>> Since low-cost newegg.com has the 3200+ OEM for $171, I bet you got
>> scammed : (
>>
>>
>> «Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
>> news:9ujfo09f6vvolbhgskjnadiorvti6imsgu@4ax.com…
>>>I got this CPU from partspc.com — a company I saw from a link on
>>> pricewatch.com — the invoice says (for that entry)
>>>
>>> AMD Athlon XP 3200+ 400fsb Processor
>>>
>>> Interestingly, when I set it to 166 and it detects as a 2500+ it seems
>>> to work fine (my system) so I suspect it is indeed a 2500+ cpu that
>>> was sent to me. I don’t have time to take it apart now, so I will do
>>> that when I get home and investigate the actual label itself.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:09:55 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Perchance, did you get this CPU on Ebay. I see at least one guy
>>>>advertising
>>>>a 3200+ in his title line and at the top of his description. But later
>>>>in
>>>>the description he makes it clear that he’s actually selling a 2500+
>>>>which
>>>>has been tested to run as a 3200+.
>>>>
>>>>Here’s a perfect example:
>>>>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=44935&item=6718137950&rd=1
>>>>
>>>>»Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
>>>>newsd9eo0tqh1d0jgvisvumgotjc7gtujb1eh@4ax.com…
>>>>> The CPU is actually supposed to be a 3200+ which is supposed to run at
>>>>> 200fsb … I will try tomorrow to set it to 166 and see if it runs as
>>>>> a 2500+ more stable … if it does run at that and seems stable I’ll
>>>>> take the CPU out and carefully remove the heat compound and see if it
>>>>> could be one of these falsely labled chips…
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:29:18 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>ur FSB to 166 as this CPU expects and you should see it as a
>>>>>>2500+ running 1.833GHz.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>>>>> News==—-
>>>>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>>>>> >100,000
>>>>> Newsgroups
>>>>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>>> News==—-
>>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>>> Newsgroups
>>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>>
>>
>
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Guest
Guest
-
#13
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:04:22 -0500, Information Scavenger <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote:
>I am not 100% sure what the chip is supposed to look like. I haven’t
>taken it apart yet (will in a couple hrs) but is there a link to a
>good picture you could direct me to so I can compare once I get it
>out?
>
>Thanks for all the help so far…I really appreciate it.
If its not for the xp3200 stiker your looking for, you wont see anything because all xp are made
with a lock-up system ( inside) that prevent you from ( in exemple) buying a xp1200 (a cheap one)
and use it as a 3200.
Maybe you’ve just buy a barton core that runs at 333fsb and is rated to be a 3200 Not the one that
runs at 400.
It simple as that cause you’ve said that it was’nt stable at 400. Anyway amdxp 400fsb 3200 are
selled at 260$ can here that would be 191$ us. how much did you pay for it.
-
#14
Take a look at this link:
http://coondwc.home.comcast.net/XP3200.jpg
The label at the bottom is what you’re looking for.
The three lines on this one are:
AXDA3200OKV4E 4159143270002
AQXDA0317HPM 1999 AMD
Here’s how to decode it:
http://www.amdboard.com/amdid.html
This example is a 3200 as indicated in the first entry. It was manufactured
in the 17th week of 2003 as indicated in the third entry.
«Dreamaker» <thinkthinkthink@theEnd.com> wrote in message
news:ss4io0p9mque38nb260h2qv1d9pvad75k2@4ax.com…
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:04:22 -0500, Information Scavenger
> <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote:
>
>>I am not 100% sure what the chip is supposed to look like. I haven’t
>>taken it apart yet (will in a couple hrs) but is there a link to a
>>good picture you could direct me to so I can compare once I get it
>>out?
>>
>>Thanks for all the help so far…I really appreciate it.
>
>
> If its not for the xp3200 stiker your looking for, you wont see anything
> because all xp are made
> with a lock-up system ( inside) that prevent you from ( in exemple) buying
> a xp1200 (a cheap one)
> and use it as a 3200.
>
> Maybe you’ve just buy a barton core that runs at 333fsb and is rated to be
> a 3200 Not the one that
> runs at 400.
>
> It simple as that cause you’ve said that it was’nt stable at 400. Anyway
> amdxp 400fsb 3200 are
> selled at 260$ can here that would be 191$ us. how much did you pay for
> it.
Guest
Guest
-
#15
The little black sticker on the side of my CPU says this:
AXDA3200DKV4E Y840917700218
AQXDA0351XPFW (c) 1999 AMD
Also, in one of my previous posts I said that it seemed to run stable
at 2500+ but that does not appear to be the case. After running it
for a few hours, I moved my mouse to interrupt the screen saver (logon
screen actually, running XP Pro) and as soon as I moved the mouse, the
computer rebooted. I set it back down to 1100+ (100fsb) and it seems
to work still.
Whats odd though, and I don’t think this is normal, the WARRANTY VOID
IF REMOVED sticker was not on the cpu as I would have though, but
instead it was on the outside of the plastic clam shell container.
Also someone asked how much I paid for it. Below is a link to the
CPU/MB combo I purchased…it seems the price now is about the same as
it was when I got it…about $181 for the combo. Based on previous
posts I suspect that since the CPU itself in some places should be
about that price, perhaps they gave me one they got at a discounted
price (IE possibly incorrectly marked). Maybe I should send it back
and get a replacement and then try it once with the new one. All I
know is that I didn’t pay nearly $200 to go down from an XP 2200+ (1.8
ghz) to an 1100+ system.
http://www.partspc.com/store/product3529.html
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 18:09:54 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
wrote:
>Take a look at this link:
>http://coondwc.home.comcast.net/XP3200.jpg
>
>The label at the bottom is what you’re looking for.
>The three lines on this one are:
>
>AXDA3200OKV4E 4159143270002
>AQXDA0317HPM 1999 AMD
>
>Here’s how to decode it:
>http://www.amdboard.com/amdid.html
>
>This example is a 3200 as indicated in the first entry. It was manufactured
>in the 17th week of 2003 as indicated in the third entry.
>
>
>
>»Dreamaker» <thinkthinkthink@theEnd.com> wrote in message
>news:ss4io0p9mque38nb260h2qv1d9pvad75k2@4ax.com…
>> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:04:22 -0500, Information Scavenger
>> <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I am not 100% sure what the chip is supposed to look like. I haven’t
>>>taken it apart yet (will in a couple hrs) but is there a link to a
>>>good picture you could direct me to so I can compare once I get it
>>>out?
>>>
>>>Thanks for all the help so far…I really appreciate it.
>>
>>
>> If its not for the xp3200 stiker your looking for, you wont see anything
>> because all xp are made
>> with a lock-up system ( inside) that prevent you from ( in exemple) buying
>> a xp1200 (a cheap one)
>> and use it as a 3200.
>>
>> Maybe you’ve just buy a barton core that runs at 333fsb and is rated to be
>> a 3200 Not the one that
>> runs at 400.
>>
>> It simple as that cause you’ve said that it was’nt stable at 400. Anyway
>> amdxp 400fsb 3200 are
>> selled at 260$ can here that would be 191$ us. how much did you pay for
>> it.
>
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Guest
Guest
-
#16
Also I’m not sure how accurate or how much help this will be, but I
downloaded CPUZ from www.cpuid.com and here is the output: (Keep in
mind that its currently underclocked to 1100+ in order for me to be
able to function without continuous and interrmittent reboots and
other odd things…when I set my CPU to the speed it is SUPPOSED to
be, everything it does tells me its acting like its overclocked…
———————-
CPU-Z version 1.24
———————-
CPUID Output
——————————————————————————
Number of CPUs 1
Name AMD Athlon XP
Code name Barton
Specification AMD Athlon(tm)
Family/Model/Stepping 6A0
Extended Family/Model 7/A
Package Socket A
Technology 0.13µ
Instructions Sets MMX, Extended MMX, 3DNow!, Extended
3DNow!, SSE
Clock Speed 1102.5 MHz
Clock multiplier x11.0
Front Side Bus Frequency 100.2 MHz
Bus Speed 200.5 MHz
L1 Data Cache 64 KBytes, 2-way set associative, 64
Bytes line size
L1 Instruction Cache 64 KBytes, 2-way set associative, 64
Bytes line size
L2 Cache 512 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64
Bytes line size
L2 Speed 1102.5 MHz (Full)
L2 Location On Chip
L2 Data Prefetch Logic yes
L2 Bus Width 64 bits
eax ebx ecx
edx
Function 00000000 00000001 68747541
444d4163 69746e65
Function 00000001 000006a0 00000000
00000000 0383fbff
Function 80000000 80000008 68747541
444d4163 69746e65
Function 80000001 000007a0 00000000
00000000 c1c3fbff
Function 80000002 20444d41 6c687441
74286e6f 0020296d
Function 80000003 00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000
Function 80000004 00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000
Function 80000005 0408ff08 ff20ff10
40020140 40020140
Function 80000006 00000000 41004100
02008140 00000000
Function 80000007 00000000 00000000
00000000 00000001
Function 80000008 00002022 00000000
00000000 00000000
edx eax
MSR C0010015 00000000 00031008
Chipset
——————————————————————————
Northbridge nVidia nForce2 400 rev. C1
Southbridge nVidia nForce2 MCP rev. A4
Graphic Interface AGP
AGP Revision 3.0
AGP Transfert Rate 8x
AGP SBA supported, enabled
AGP Aperture 64 MBytes
Memory Type DDR
Memory Size 1024 MBytes
Memory Frequency 100.2 MHz (1:1)
CAS# 2.5
RAS# to CAS# 2
RAS# Precharge 2
Cycle Time (tRAS) 4
Memory SPD
——————————————————————————
DIMM #2
General
Memory type DDR-SDRAM
Manufacturer (ID) (0000000000000000)
Size 512 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3200 (200 MHz)
Part number
Manufacturing date Week 00/Year 00
Attributes
Number of banks 2
Data width 64 bits
Correction None
Registered no
Buffered no
Timings table
Frequency (MHz) 200
CAS# 2.5
RAS# to CAS# delay 3
RAS# Precharge 3
TRAS# 8
DIMM #3
General
Memory type DDR-SDRAM
Manufacturer (ID) (0000000000000000)
Size 512 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3200 (200 MHz)
Part number
Manufacturing date Week 00/Year 00
Attributes
Number of banks 2
Data width 64 bits
Correction None
Registered no
Buffered no
Timings table
Frequency (MHz) 200
CAS# 2.5
RAS# to CAS# delay 3
RAS# Precharge 3
TRAS# 8
Monitoring
——————————————————————————
Sensor Chip Asus ASB100
PCI Device List
——————————————————————————
CPU to PCI Bridge
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x01E0
revision 0x00C1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80AC
class code 0x06
sub class code 0x020
bus 0, device 0, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 E0 01 06 00 B0 00 C1 00 00 06 00 00 80 00
10 08 00 00 E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 AC 80
30 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
40 02 60 30 00 1B 42 00 1F 12 03 00 00 FF FF FF FF
50 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
60 08 00 01 20 20 00 88 80 10 00 00 00 01 FF 0F 9F
70 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
80 0E 01 00 00 FF FF FF 3F 01 00 00 00 01 80 00 00
90 0E 80 E0 F2 0E 80 E0 F0 F0 0F FF 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 28 98 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 CC FF 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 33 33 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 56 01 47 00 16 30 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 07 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Memory device
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x01EA
revision 0x00C1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80AC
class code 0x05
sub class code 0x020
bus 0, device 0, function 1
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 EA 01 00 00 20 00 C1 00 00 05 00 00 80 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 AC 80
30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF 00 00 00
40 04 00 00 70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 0D 03 42 81 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00
70 18 24 00 00 18 24 00 00 2C 07 00 01 40 07 00 01
80 01 00 00 00 F2 13 0F 03 08 05 08 05 78 C8 A6 3F
90 07 08 22 22 40 22 43 21 00 11 54 01 0D 22 77 07
A0 6A 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 6A 00 00 00 00 00 10 00
B0 6A 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 2A 00 00 00 01 00 10 00
C0 10 31 22 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF FF 02 00
D0 44 4E 00 00 22 22 00 00 0D 00 00 00 1E 00 00 00
E0 1A 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 88 44 44 10 B1 04 30 40
F0 10 18 1E 03 04 10 04 3F 09 44 1C 04 01 03 70 30
Memory device
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x01EE
revision 0x00C1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80AC
class code 0x05
sub class code 0x020
bus 0, device 0, function 2
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 EE 01 00 00 20 00 C1 00 00 05 00 00 80 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 AC 80
30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF 00 00 00
40 01 20 DA 12 01 20 DA 12 00 00 00 02 01 00 37 1F
50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 FF FF CC 06 FF DF BE 04 FF 6F 7E 02 FF DF FF 03
80 FF 1F F7 07 FF FF 9F 07 FF FF 6F 06 FF 4F BF 06
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 77 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 E0 FF FF FF E3
E0 01 80 A9 06 01 80 A9 06 01 80 A9 06 01 80 A9 06
F0 01 80 A9 06 01 80 A9 06 01 80 A9 06 01 80 A9 06
Memory device
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x01ED
revision 0x00C1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80AC
class code 0x05
sub class code 0x020
bus 0, device 0, function 3
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 ED 01 00 00 20 00 C1 00 00 05 00 00 80 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 AC 80
30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
40 30 00 00 00 00 90 00 00 63 00 00 00 71 07 00 00
50 76 06 00 00 72 95 00 00 68 EA 00 00 50 40 20 00
60 E9 00 00 00 00 06 F7 67 00 EA AA AA 88 BA 00 77
70 01 80 E0 01 6A 00 00 00 03 10 01 20 33 00 02 09
80 FF FF 00 00 FF FF FF FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 FF 10 FF 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 FF 30 00 00 FF 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 40 00 00 FF FF FF FF
F0 1C 40 00 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
Memory device
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x01EC
revision 0x00C1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80AC
class code 0x05
sub class code 0x020
bus 0, device 0, function 4
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 EC 01 00 00 20 00 C1 00 00 05 00 00 80 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 AC 80
30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF 00 00 00
40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 AA 33 AA 33 AA 22 AA 22 AA 11 AA 11 AA 33 AA 33
70 FF 99 FF 99 F0 00 00 00 7F 3C E0 0F AA 22 AA 11
80 FF 99 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 7F 7F 7F 7F 7D 7C 7B 7B 24 24 24 24 23 23 23 23
A0 00 00 00 00 54 AA 00 00 00 00 00 00 5F 05 A0 00
B0 78 56 34 12 EF CD AB 89 9B 4A 66 22 EE BD DC 8B
C0 66 06 11 01 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 00 00 00 00 00
D0 FF 20 FF 20 FF 20 FF 7F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Memory device
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x01EF
revision 0x00C1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80AC
class code 0x05
sub class code 0x020
bus 0, device 0, function 5
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 EF 01 00 00 20 00 C1 00 00 05 00 00 80 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 AC 80
30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF 00 00 00
40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 BC 58 F9 05 BC 58 F9 05
50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 FF FF FF 3F 00 00 00 00 FF FF FF 3F
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
PCI to ISA Bridge
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0060
revision 0x00A4
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80AD
class code 0x06
sub class code 0x021
bus 0, device 1, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 60 00 0F 00 B0 00 A4 00 01 06 00 00 80 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 AD 80
30 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
40 43 10 AD 80 DE FD 3C 08 08 00 E1 01 60 00 88 08
50 A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 01 40 00 00 01 44 00 00 01 42 00 00 00 00 F8 FF
70 10 00 FF FF 03 00 00 00 0F 00 40 00 00 D0 00 00
80 09 20 00 00 D8 08 0D 00 3F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 33 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 CC 00 02 00 0A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 11 00 07 1F 50 00 00 00 28 26 08 00 00 00 00
F0 00 FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
SMBus controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0064
revision 0x00A2
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x0C11
class code 0x0C
sub class code 0x025
bus 0, device 1, function 1
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 64 00 01 00 B0 00 A2 00 05 0C 00 00 80 00
10 01 D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 11 0C
30 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0B 01 03 01
40 43 10 11 0C 01 00 02 C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00
50 01 50 00 00 01 55 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
USB bus controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0067
revision 0x00A4
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x0C11
class code 0x0C
sub class code 0x023
bus 0, device 2, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 67 00 07 00 B0 00 A4 10 03 0C 00 00 80 00
10 00 40 00 E6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 11 0C
30 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 14 01 03 01
40 43 10 11 0C 01 00 02 FE 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00
50 02 00 00 00 1D 47 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
USB bus controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0067
revision 0x00A4
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x0C11
class code 0x0C
sub class code 0x023
bus 0, device 2, function 1
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 67 00 07 00 B0 00 A4 10 03 0C 00 00 80 00
10 00 50 00 E6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 11 0C
30 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 15 02 03 01
40 43 10 11 0C 01 00 02 FE 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00
50 0C 00 00 00 1D 47 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
USB bus controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0068
revision 0x00A4
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x0C11
class code 0x0C
sub class code 0x023
bus 0, device 2, function 2
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 68 00 06 00 B0 00 A4 20 03 0C 00 00 80 00
10 00 00 00 E6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 11 0C
30 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 16 03 03 01
40 43 10 11 0C 0A 80 80 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 20 20 01 00 00 60 98 81 C3 03 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 05 00 10 20 80 89 3D 84 22 E7 25 04 80
80 01 00 02 FE 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 15 16 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Ethernet network controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0066
revision 0x00A1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x80A7
class code 0x02
sub class code 0x020
bus 0, device 4, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 66 00 07 00 B0 00 A1 00 00 02 00 00 00 00
10 00 10 00 E6 01 D4 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 A7 80
30 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 14 01 01 14
40 43 10 A7 80 01 00 02 FE 00 01 00 00 04 00 00 00
50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Audio controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x006A
revision 0x00A1
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x8095
class code 0x04
sub class code 0x021
bus 0, device 6, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 6A 00 07 00 B0 00 A1 00 01 04 00 00 00 00
10 01 D8 00 00 01 DC 00 00 00 20 00 E6 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 95 80
30 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 15 01 02 05
40 43 10 95 80 01 00 02 06 00 00 00 00 06 01 01 01
50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
PCI to PCI Bridge
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x006C
revision 0x00A3
sub vendor ID 0x0000 (unknown)
sub device ID 0x0000
class code 0x06
sub class code 0x024
bus 0, device 8, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 6C 00 07 01 A0 00 A3 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 20 F0 00 80 22
20 F0 FF 00 00 F0 FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 02
40 00 00 00 00 01 00 02 00 03 00 00 00 08 0B 07 00
50 0C 0D FE 3F 0E 0F 00 00 70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
IDE Disk controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0065
revision 0x00A2
sub vendor ID 0x1043 (AsusTek)
sub device ID 0x0C11
class code 0x01
sub class code 0x021
bus 0, device 9, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 65 00 05 00 B0 00 A2 8A 01 01 00 00 00 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 01 F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 11 0C
30 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 01
40 43 10 11 0C 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 09 00 00
50 03 F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 A8 20 A8 20 66 00 20 20
60 00 C0 00 C6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 40 B3 21 00 00 02 1C 00 C8 AA 1F
90 00 00 02 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
PCI to PCI Bridge
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x01E8
revision 0x00C1
sub vendor ID 0x0000 (unknown)
sub device ID 0x0000
class code 0x06
sub class code 0x024
bus 0, device 1E, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 E8 01 07 01 20 02 C1 00 04 06 00 20 01 00
10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 02 20 F0 00 20 22
20 00 E4 F0 E5 00 D0 F0 DF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0A 00
40 01 00 00 00 00 00 F0 3F 20 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF
50 00 00 00 E0 00 F0 FF E3 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
60 FF 40 FF 40 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF
70 FF FF FF FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF
80 FF FF FF FF 00 80 01 00 CB 01 00 00 FF FF FF FF
90 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
A0 1B 42 00 1F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
B0 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
C0 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
D0 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
E0 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
F0 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
VGA display controller
vendor ID 0x10DE (nVidia)
device ID 0x0342
revision 0x00A1
sub vendor ID 0x0000 (unknown)
sub device ID 0x0000
class code 0x03
sub class code 0x020
bus 2, device 0, function 0
Register configuration
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
00 DE 10 42 03 07 00 B0 02 A1 00 00 03 00 F8 00 00
10 00 00 00 E4 08 00 00 D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30 00 00 00 00 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 13 01 05 01
40 00 00 00 00 02 00 30 00 1B 0E 00 1F 12 43 00 1F
50 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 CE D6 23 00 0F 00 00 00
60 01 44 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
A0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
B0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
C0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
E0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
DMI
——————————————————————————
DMI BIOS
———
BIOS #1
vendor Phoenix Technologies, LTD
version ASUS A7N8X-X ACPI BIOS Rev 1011
date 08/04/2004
DMI System Information
———————-
System #1
manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC.
product A7N8X-X
version REV 2.xx
serial xxxxxxxxxxx
UUID FFFFFFFF-FFFFFFFF-FFFFFFFF-FFFFFFFF
DMI Baseboard
————-
Baseboard #1
vendor ASUSTeK Computer INC.
model A7N8X-X
revision REV 2.xx
serial xxxxxxxxxxx
DMI System Enclosure
———————
System enclosure #1
manufacturer Chassis Manufactture
chassis type Desktop
chassis serial Chassis serial Number
DMI Processor
————-
CPU #1
manufacturer AMD
model AMD Athlon(tm) XP
clock speed 1100.0MHz
FSB speed 100.0MHz
multiplier 11.0x
DMI Memory Controller
———————
Memory Controller #1
correction unknown
Max module size 1024MBytes
DMI Memory Module
——————
Memory Module #1
designation DDR1
size 512MBytes (double bank)
Memory Module #2
designation DDR2
size 512MBytes (double bank)
Memory Module #3
designation DDR3
DMI Port Connector
——————
Port #1
designation PRIMARY IDE/HDD (internal)
connector On Board IDE
Port #2
designation SECONDARY IDE/HDD (internal)
connector On Board IDE
Port #3
designation FLOPPY (internal)
connector On Board Floppy
Port #4
designation Serial Port 1 (internal)
designation Serial Port 1 (external)
port type Serial Port 16550
connector DB-9 male
Port #5
designation Serial Port 2 (internal)
designation Serial Port 2 (external)
port type Serial Port 16550
connector DB-9 male
Port #6
designation Parallel Port (internal)
designation Parallel Port (external)
port type Parallel Port ECP/EPP
connector DB-25 female
Port #7
designation PS/2 Keyboard (internal)
designation PS/2 Keyboard (external)
port type Keyboard Port
connector PS/2
Port #8
designation PS/2 Mouse (internal)
designation PS/2 Mouse (external)
port type Mouse Port
connector PS/2
Port #9
designation USB1 (external)
port type USB
connector Access Bus (USB)
Port #10
designation USB2 (external)
port type USB
connector Access Bus (USB)
Port #11
designation USB3 (external)
port type USB
connector Access Bus (USB)
Port #12
designation USB4 (external)
port type USB
connector Access Bus (USB)
Port #13
designation USB5 (external)
port type USB
connector Access Bus (USB)
Port #14
designation USB6 (external)
port type USB
connector Access Bus (USB)
Port #15
designation ETHERNET (external)
port type Network Port
connector RJ-45
Port #16
designation ETHERNET (external)
port type Network Port
connector RJ-45
Port #17
designation Joystic Port (external)
port type Joystick Port
connector DB-15 female
Port #18
designation MIDI Port (external)
port type MIDI Port
connector DB-15 female
Port #19
designation Onboard 1394 (external)
port type Firewire (IEEE P1394)
connector IEEE 1394
Port #20
designation Line In Jack Port (external)
port type Audio Port
connector Mini Jack (headphones)
DMI Extension Slot
——————
Slot #1
designation PCI1
type PCI
width 32 bits
populated no
Slot #2
designation PCI2
type PCI
width 32 bits
populated no
Slot #3
designation PCI3
type PCI
width 32 bits
populated no
Slot #4
designation PCI4
type PCI
width 32 bits
populated no
Slot #5
designation PCI5
type PCI
width 32 bits
populated no
Slot #6
designation AGP
type AGP
width 32 bits
populated no
DMI Physical Memory Array
————————-
Physical Memory Array #1
location Motherboard
usage System Memory
correction None
max capacity 1536MBytes
max# of devices 3
DMI Memory Device
——————
Memory Device #1
designation DDR1
format DIMM
type DRAM
total width 72bits
data width 64bits
size 512MBytes
speed 68MHz
Memory Device #2
designation DDR2
format DIMM
type DRAM
total width 72bits
data width 64bits
size 512MBytes
speed 68MHz
Memory Device #3
designation DDR3
format DIMM
type DRAM
total width 72bits
data width 64bits
speed 68MHz
Software
——————————————————————————
Windows Version Microsoft Windows XP Workstation Service Pack
2 (Build 2600)
DirectX Version 9.0c
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
-
#17
So you have an authentic XP3200+ 400FSB 11x multiplier.
Assuming the CPU is genuine (for sake of further analysis), there are a
number of other components that could cause you problems:
1) Undersized power supply — very common problem with high-performance
CPUs;
2) Bad memory chips — CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can be
used to stress test them.
3) Defective motherboard;
4) Bad XP install — yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically
improved the performance of my A7V880.
5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often
reported to be a problem.
6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at?
I think you have to eliminate all these before you conclude that the CPU is
defective.
I’m sure others will contribute other possibilities and ideas to my list.
Best of luck
«Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
news:i39io05sl3irn25kp2c0r2223olf5dfblo@4ax.com…
> The little black sticker on the side of my CPU says this:
>
> AXDA3200DKV4E Y840917700218
> AQXDA0351XPFW (c) 1999 AMD
>
>
> Also, in one of my previous posts I said that it seemed to run stable
> at 2500+ but that does not appear to be the case. After running it
> for a few hours, I moved my mouse to interrupt the screen saver (logon
> screen actually, running XP Pro) and as soon as I moved the mouse, the
> computer rebooted. I set it back down to 1100+ (100fsb) and it seems
> to work still.
>
> Whats odd though, and I don’t think this is normal, the WARRANTY VOID
> IF REMOVED sticker was not on the cpu as I would have though, but
> instead it was on the outside of the plastic clam shell container.
>
> Also someone asked how much I paid for it. Below is a link to the
> CPU/MB combo I purchased…it seems the price now is about the same as
> it was when I got it…about $181 for the combo. Based on previous
> posts I suspect that since the CPU itself in some places should be
> about that price, perhaps they gave me one they got at a discounted
> price (IE possibly incorrectly marked). Maybe I should send it back
> and get a replacement and then try it once with the new one. All I
> know is that I didn’t pay nearly $200 to go down from an XP 2200+ (1.8
> ghz) to an 1100+ system.
>
> http://www.partspc.com/store/product3529.html
>
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 18:09:54 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Take a look at this link:
>>http://coondwc.home.comcast.net/XP3200.jpg
>>
>>The label at the bottom is what you’re looking for.
>>The three lines on this one are:
>>
>>AXDA3200OKV4E 4159143270002
>>AQXDA0317HPM 1999 AMD
>>
>>Here’s how to decode it:
>>http://www.amdboard.com/amdid.html
>>
>>This example is a 3200 as indicated in the first entry. It was
>>manufactured
>>in the 17th week of 2003 as indicated in the third entry.
>>
>>
>>
>>»Dreamaker» <thinkthinkthink@theEnd.com> wrote in message
>>news:ss4io0p9mque38nb260h2qv1d9pvad75k2@4ax.com…
>>> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:04:22 -0500, Information Scavenger
>>> <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am not 100% sure what the chip is supposed to look like. I haven’t
>>>>taken it apart yet (will in a couple hrs) but is there a link to a
>>>>good picture you could direct me to so I can compare once I get it
>>>>out?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for all the help so far…I really appreciate it.
>>>
>>>
>>> If its not for the xp3200 stiker your looking for, you wont see anything
>>> because all xp are made
>>> with a lock-up system ( inside) that prevent you from ( in exemple)
>>> buying
>>> a xp1200 (a cheap one)
>>> and use it as a 3200.
>>>
>>> Maybe you’ve just buy a barton core that runs at 333fsb and is rated to
>>> be
>>> a 3200 Not the one that
>>> runs at 400.
>>>
>>> It simple as that cause you’ve said that it was’nt stable at 400. Anyway
>>> amdxp 400fsb 3200 are
>>> selled at 260$ can here that would be 191$ us. how much did you pay for
>>> it.
>>
>
>
>
> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==—-
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
> Newsgroups
> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Guest
Guest
-
#18
I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the
line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a
bit larger than most (450 or 500 I’ve seen a lot of) so unless its
bad, I’d think it shouldn’t be undersized. The only thing I have in
my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb
video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the
MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1.
I have 5 different memory chips I’ve tried (two different pairs of
identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just
got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips
I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the
RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything
other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not
the issue…that rules out number 2.
Now for number 3…defective MB, thats not something I’d hoped to
hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which
I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a
computer with…I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that
MB and see what happens.
I would like to rule out number 4…I wor extremely hard to keep my
copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care
of my OS. I don’t install programs I don’t need (heck, even if its
one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I
am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine…but this install I
am running with now is relatively brand new…the only thing thats
been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and
MS Office. Maybe a graphics program…it has worked flawlessly for
months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its
underclocked…
For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system
components…the only thing that isn’t built onto my MB besides the HD
and RAM and CPU of course is the video card…and I have tried 3
different video cards all with the same results…so I’d like to
possibly rule that out.
How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display
unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I’m
sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79
degrees mostly…occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever
been above that, I just wasn’t looking. The thermal compound I used
was the one that they sent with the CPU…I suppose its possible that
it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven’t
tried…didn’t even think it was a culprit actually.
Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that
the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I’ll try the
other one tomorrow and see what happens. I’d try it today but I’ve
about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to
fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going
to work…and I don’t want to sit here poking at it for an hour…I
may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now
and take tomorrow to work on the MB.
>
>1) Undersized power supply — very common problem with high-performance
>CPUs;
>2) Bad memory chips — CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can be
>used to stress test them.
>3) Defective motherboard;
>4) Bad XP install — yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically
>improved the performance of my A7V880.
>5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often
>reported to be a problem.
>6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at?
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Rob
Distinguished
-
- Dec 31, 2007
-
- 1,573
-
- 0
-
- 19,780
-
#19
Information Scavenger wrote:
>Also I’m not sure how accurate or how much help this will be, but I
>downloaded CPUZ from www.cpuid.com and here is the output: (Keep in
>mind that its currently underclocked to 1100+ in order for me to be
>able to function without continuous and interrmittent reboots and
>
<snip>
Have you tried relaxing your BIOS memory settings at 200mhz and then
running Memtest86? Think they may just be a little to tight for 200mhz
but might work OK at 100mhz. I would try setting them for 7-3-3-2.5 to
start.
Rob
-
#20
Your power supply certainly sounds much more than ample : )
As far as memory goes, definitely do your tests using only one stick at a
time. That’s all you need and it reduces the possibilities of one stick
being bad.
Do a google search on memtest86 and you’ll easily find a place to download
it. Follow the instructions to create a floppy. Boot from the floppy and
let memtest86 run as long as possible.
As far as Windows goes, I also keep my version as clean as possible.
However, when I installed my new A7V880 motherboard, I had to install the
accompanying drivers and drivers for my new Radeon 9200. Soon found out the
drivers that came with the MB were generally buggy — version 1.0 — so I
had to download and install new drivers. Ditto for the Radeon drivers. By
the time I got done, my OS was a mess. Took 3 minutes to boot. A clean
install of Win XP solved all my problems.
Download ASUS Probe from www.asus.com to monitor your CPU temperature. You
should always run a «motherboard monitor» with a new MB/CPU installation.
Just to make sure you don’t fry your CPU and that your voltages are correct.
I used to use MotherboardMonitor 5 but it doesn’t support the A7V880 : (
However it does support your board so look for it using google.
Supposedly «misery loves company.» My similar battle has been trying to
get my DVD writer working on my XP SP2 machine. Worked well before I
installed SP2 so I concluded that had to be the problem. I thought I
confirmed that by installing it in a Win ME machine I keep for the
grandkids. It worked! Proof positive! Next step was to install it in my
wife’s XP machine with SP1 installed. It sorta worked but then it also
occasionally failed. So maybe SP2 isn’t the problem. This battle has spanned
several weeks. Today I received a new Optorite 12X DVD writer (from newegg
$60 shipped) and, like magic, it works flawlessly! Tons of more
capabilities like DVD+/-R, dual layer and HD-Burn (can burn 80% more onto a
CDR 1.26GB to 1.44GB). So now I have this old (8/22/04) 8X DVD writer to
ponder.
Best of luck
«Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
news:monio054dbm65usd5pfvhvrav1j672474m@4ax.com…
>I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the
> line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a
> bit larger than most (450 or 500 I’ve seen a lot of) so unless its
> bad, I’d think it shouldn’t be undersized. The only thing I have in
> my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb
> video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the
> MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1.
>
> I have 5 different memory chips I’ve tried (two different pairs of
> identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just
> got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips
> I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the
> RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything
> other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not
> the issue…that rules out number 2.
>
> Now for number 3…defective MB, thats not something I’d hoped to
> hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which
> I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a
> computer with…I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that
> MB and see what happens.
>
> I would like to rule out number 4…I wor extremely hard to keep my
> copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care
> of my OS. I don’t install programs I don’t need (heck, even if its
> one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I
> am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine…but this install I
> am running with now is relatively brand new…the only thing thats
> been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and
> MS Office. Maybe a graphics program…it has worked flawlessly for
> months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its
> underclocked…
>
> For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system
> components…the only thing that isn’t built onto my MB besides the HD
> and RAM and CPU of course is the video card…and I have tried 3
> different video cards all with the same results…so I’d like to
> possibly rule that out.
>
> How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display
> unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I’m
> sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79
> degrees mostly…occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever
> been above that, I just wasn’t looking. The thermal compound I used
> was the one that they sent with the CPU…I suppose its possible that
> it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven’t
> tried…didn’t even think it was a culprit actually.
>
>
>
>
> Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that
> the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I’ll try the
> other one tomorrow and see what happens. I’d try it today but I’ve
> about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to
> fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going
> to work…and I don’t want to sit here poking at it for an hour…I
> may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now
> and take tomorrow to work on the MB.
>
>>
>>1) Undersized power supply — very common problem with high-performance
>>CPUs;
>>2) Bad memory chips — CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can
>>be
>>used to stress test them.
>>3) Defective motherboard;
>>4) Bad XP install — yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically
>>improved the performance of my A7V880.
>>5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often
>>reported to be a problem.
>>6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at?
>
>
> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==—-
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
> Newsgroups
> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Guest
Guest
-
#21
I got Asus Probe and it says my CPU is running currently (with the
compound that came with my CPU) at 42c (107f) and the MB is running at
28c (82f).
I don’t know if those are normal or not but the probe reports all as
normal.
I am going to look for the MOTHERBOARD MONITOR also and see if it
reports anything differently…and I’ll let memtest86 do its thing and
see what happens…by the time I do that and play with my this other
MB I should be all set (hopefully) but will post one way or another.
I work in IT (hands on computer work for a couple years back) and
every time I run into a problem with my own PC’s like this it
sometimes takes a while for me to figure it out — mainly because only
the extremely annoying cases pop up (which I should probably be
thankful for because after tackling something like this, I feel like I
can take on any other problem with more confidence that whatever it is
will most likely be conquered hehe…
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 23:57:00 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
wrote:
>Your power supply certainly sounds much more than ample : )
>
>As far as memory goes, definitely do your tests using only one stick at a
>time. That’s all you need and it reduces the possibilities of one stick
>being bad.
>
>Do a google search on memtest86 and you’ll easily find a place to download
>it. Follow the instructions to create a floppy. Boot from the floppy and
>let memtest86 run as long as possible.
>
>As far as Windows goes, I also keep my version as clean as possible.
>However, when I installed my new A7V880 motherboard, I had to install the
>accompanying drivers and drivers for my new Radeon 9200. Soon found out the
>drivers that came with the MB were generally buggy — version 1.0 — so I
>had to download and install new drivers. Ditto for the Radeon drivers. By
>the time I got done, my OS was a mess. Took 3 minutes to boot. A clean
>install of Win XP solved all my problems.
>
>Download ASUS Probe from www.asus.com to monitor your CPU temperature. You
>should always run a «motherboard monitor» with a new MB/CPU installation.
>Just to make sure you don’t fry your CPU and that your voltages are correct.
>I used to use MotherboardMonitor 5 but it doesn’t support the A7V880 : (
>However it does support your board so look for it using google.
>
>Supposedly «misery loves company.» My similar battle has been trying to
>get my DVD writer working on my XP SP2 machine. Worked well before I
>installed SP2 so I concluded that had to be the problem. I thought I
>confirmed that by installing it in a Win ME machine I keep for the
>grandkids. It worked! Proof positive! Next step was to install it in my
>wife’s XP machine with SP1 installed. It sorta worked but then it also
>occasionally failed. So maybe SP2 isn’t the problem. This battle has spanned
>several weeks. Today I received a new Optorite 12X DVD writer (from newegg
>$60 shipped) and, like magic, it works flawlessly! Tons of more
>capabilities like DVD+/-R, dual layer and HD-Burn (can burn 80% more onto a
>CDR 1.26GB to 1.44GB). So now I have this old (8/22/04) 8X DVD writer to
>ponder.
>
>Best of luck
>
>
>»Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
>news:monio054dbm65usd5pfvhvrav1j672474m@4ax.com…
>>I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the
>> line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a
>> bit larger than most (450 or 500 I’ve seen a lot of) so unless its
>> bad, I’d think it shouldn’t be undersized. The only thing I have in
>> my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb
>> video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the
>> MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1.
>>
>> I have 5 different memory chips I’ve tried (two different pairs of
>> identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just
>> got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips
>> I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the
>> RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything
>> other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not
>> the issue…that rules out number 2.
>>
>> Now for number 3…defective MB, thats not something I’d hoped to
>> hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which
>> I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a
>> computer with…I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that
>> MB and see what happens.
>>
>> I would like to rule out number 4…I wor extremely hard to keep my
>> copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care
>> of my OS. I don’t install programs I don’t need (heck, even if its
>> one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I
>> am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine…but this install I
>> am running with now is relatively brand new…the only thing thats
>> been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and
>> MS Office. Maybe a graphics program…it has worked flawlessly for
>> months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its
>> underclocked…
>>
>> For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system
>> components…the only thing that isn’t built onto my MB besides the HD
>> and RAM and CPU of course is the video card…and I have tried 3
>> different video cards all with the same results…so I’d like to
>> possibly rule that out.
>>
>> How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display
>> unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I’m
>> sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79
>> degrees mostly…occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever
>> been above that, I just wasn’t looking. The thermal compound I used
>> was the one that they sent with the CPU…I suppose its possible that
>> it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven’t
>> tried…didn’t even think it was a culprit actually.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that
>> the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I’ll try the
>> other one tomorrow and see what happens. I’d try it today but I’ve
>> about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to
>> fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going
>> to work…and I don’t want to sit here poking at it for an hour…I
>> may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now
>> and take tomorrow to work on the MB.
>>
>>>
>>>1) Undersized power supply — very common problem with high-performance
>>>CPUs;
>>>2) Bad memory chips — CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can
>>>be
>>>used to stress test them.
>>>3) Defective motherboard;
>>>4) Bad XP install — yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically
>>>improved the performance of my A7V880.
>>>5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often
>>>reported to be a problem.
>>>6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at?
>>
>>
>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>> News==—-
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>> Newsgroups
>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>
—-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—-
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
—= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
-
#22
Your temperatures are good. 107f is lukewarm water; OK for activating yeast
(either beer or bread) so it can’t hurt your CPU. Of course I assume you’re
running the CPU at 1.1Ghz so these temperatures will rise when you get it
up to full 2.2GHz speed. The maximum die temperature is something like 85C
but I’d get antsy above 55C. Actually much above 45C gets my attention.
I’m currently at 41C with a 2.167GHz 3000+.
«Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
news:8r8jo0ds52qihp8gopm7r3dii8eevlsdnn@4ax.com…
>I got Asus Probe and it says my CPU is running currently (with the
> compound that came with my CPU) at 42c (107f) and the MB is running at
> 28c (82f).
>
> I don’t know if those are normal or not but the probe reports all as
> normal.
>
> I am going to look for the MOTHERBOARD MONITOR also and see if it
> reports anything differently…and I’ll let memtest86 do its thing and
> see what happens…by the time I do that and play with my this other
> MB I should be all set (hopefully) but will post one way or another.
>
> I work in IT (hands on computer work for a couple years back) and
> every time I run into a problem with my own PC’s like this it
> sometimes takes a while for me to figure it out — mainly because only
> the extremely annoying cases pop up (which I should probably be
> thankful for because after tackling something like this, I feel like I
> can take on any other problem with more confidence that whatever it is
> will most likely be conquered hehe…
>
>
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 23:57:00 GMT, «DonC» <coondwc_nospam@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Your power supply certainly sounds much more than ample : )
>>
>>As far as memory goes, definitely do your tests using only one stick at a
>>time. That’s all you need and it reduces the possibilities of one stick
>>being bad.
>>
>>Do a google search on memtest86 and you’ll easily find a place to download
>>it. Follow the instructions to create a floppy. Boot from the floppy and
>>let memtest86 run as long as possible.
>>
>>As far as Windows goes, I also keep my version as clean as possible.
>>However, when I installed my new A7V880 motherboard, I had to install the
>>accompanying drivers and drivers for my new Radeon 9200. Soon found out
>>the
>>drivers that came with the MB were generally buggy — version 1.0 — so I
>>had to download and install new drivers. Ditto for the Radeon drivers.
>>By
>>the time I got done, my OS was a mess. Took 3 minutes to boot. A clean
>>install of Win XP solved all my problems.
>>
>>Download ASUS Probe from www.asus.com to monitor your CPU temperature.
>>You
>>should always run a «motherboard monitor» with a new MB/CPU installation.
>>Just to make sure you don’t fry your CPU and that your voltages are
>>correct.
>>I used to use MotherboardMonitor 5 but it doesn’t support the A7V880 : (
>>However it does support your board so look for it using google.
>>
>>Supposedly «misery loves company.» My similar battle has been trying to
>>get my DVD writer working on my XP SP2 machine. Worked well before I
>>installed SP2 so I concluded that had to be the problem. I thought I
>>confirmed that by installing it in a Win ME machine I keep for the
>>grandkids. It worked! Proof positive! Next step was to install it in my
>>wife’s XP machine with SP1 installed. It sorta worked but then it also
>>occasionally failed. So maybe SP2 isn’t the problem. This battle has
>>spanned
>>several weeks. Today I received a new Optorite 12X DVD writer (from
>>newegg
>>$60 shipped) and, like magic, it works flawlessly! Tons of more
>>capabilities like DVD+/-R, dual layer and HD-Burn (can burn 80% more onto
>>a
>>CDR 1.26GB to 1.44GB). So now I have this old (8/22/04) 8X DVD writer to
>>ponder.
>>
>>Best of luck
>>
>>
>>»Information Scavenger» <likeIwantspam@no-way.com> wrote in message
>>news:monio054dbm65usd5pfvhvrav1j672474m@4ax.com…
>>>I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the
>>> line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a
>>> bit larger than most (450 or 500 I’ve seen a lot of) so unless its
>>> bad, I’d think it shouldn’t be undersized. The only thing I have in
>>> my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb
>>> video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the
>>> MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1.
>>>
>>> I have 5 different memory chips I’ve tried (two different pairs of
>>> identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just
>>> got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips
>>> I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the
>>> RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything
>>> other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not
>>> the issue…that rules out number 2.
>>>
>>> Now for number 3…defective MB, thats not something I’d hoped to
>>> hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which
>>> I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a
>>> computer with…I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that
>>> MB and see what happens.
>>>
>>> I would like to rule out number 4…I wor extremely hard to keep my
>>> copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care
>>> of my OS. I don’t install programs I don’t need (heck, even if its
>>> one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I
>>> am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine…but this install I
>>> am running with now is relatively brand new…the only thing thats
>>> been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and
>>> MS Office. Maybe a graphics program…it has worked flawlessly for
>>> months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its
>>> underclocked…
>>>
>>> For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system
>>> components…the only thing that isn’t built onto my MB besides the HD
>>> and RAM and CPU of course is the video card…and I have tried 3
>>> different video cards all with the same results…so I’d like to
>>> possibly rule that out.
>>>
>>> How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display
>>> unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I’m
>>> sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79
>>> degrees mostly…occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever
>>> been above that, I just wasn’t looking. The thermal compound I used
>>> was the one that they sent with the CPU…I suppose its possible that
>>> it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven’t
>>> tried…didn’t even think it was a culprit actually.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that
>>> the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I’ll try the
>>> other one tomorrow and see what happens. I’d try it today but I’ve
>>> about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to
>>> fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going
>>> to work…and I don’t want to sit here poking at it for an hour…I
>>> may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now
>>> and take tomorrow to work on the MB.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>1) Undersized power supply — very common problem with high-performance
>>>>CPUs;
>>>>2) Bad memory chips — CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can
>>>>be
>>>>used to stress test them.
>>>>3) Defective motherboard;
>>>>4) Bad XP install — yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically
>>>>improved the performance of my A7V880.
>>>>5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often
>>>>reported to be a problem.
>>>>6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at?
>>>
>>>
>>> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>>> News==—-
>>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>>> Newsgroups
>>> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
>>
>
>
>
> —-== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com — Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==—-
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
> Newsgroups
> —= East/West-Coast Server Farms — Total Privacy via Encryption =—
Similar threads
- Advertising
- Cookies Policies
- Privacy
- Term & Conditions
Solution 1
Seriously, It may just work — but I wouldn’t…. (I don’t think you can install with less than 1GB of memory — personally, I wouldn’t use it with less than 2)
736MB of memory just isn’t a lot, and by the time you disable enough services and features (such as Aero) in order to give more free RAM, there isn’t much point in running Windows 7 for the sake of just running it.
I would personally just use it for XP and be happy.
If you still want to go ahead, try running the Windows Upgrade Advisor.
Solution 2
It shouldn’t be a problem, Running Windows 7 on a Dinosaur proves that Windows 7 can run perfectly even on a 128 MB RAM with a Pentium II CPU.
I personally have an AMD Athlon 3000+ with 1.5 GB RAM. It runs even faster than my Intel Core 2 Dual T5300 at 1.73 GHz with 2.5 GB RAM.
Solution 3
It will work, I have the same CPU in my laptop and ONLY 512 MB of RAM. I installed Windows 7 Ultimate, and it runs just fine for the Internet but as expected, it is slow for anything else.
Solution 4
It would work all right, but even if you tweak the living daylights out of it (e.g. with vLite), it won’t be as fast as Windows XP.
Is it feasible to buy a US$100 OS for such an old clunker? That’s your call
Related videos on Youtube
12 : 23
The Final Athlon XP 3200+ building a 2003 Retro Gaming PC
13 : 57
AMD Athlon XP & Windows XP in 2021 … Let’s go back in TIME ! 😄
06 : 00
Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit vs AMD Athlon XP 2500 Barton
02 : 11
Windows 7 on Athlon XP 2200+ 736 MB — feasible? (4 Solutions!!)
37 : 22
AMD Athlon XP DOS/Windows 98 (Very Red) PC Build
Comments
-
I have a
has_many_and_belongs_to_many
relationship betweenitems
andbuilds
.
Whatever I do, I just cannot get the name of the items to be displayed forHow do I output name instead of ID?
and the rest. It just displays the ID :/.In the code provided below, the ID of the items are being displayed instead of the name of the item with that ID. How do I display the name of the item?
<% current_user.builds.each do |build| %> <tr> <td><%= build.hero.name%></td> <td><%= build.user.email%></td> <td><%= build.name %></td> <td><%= build.starting_items %></td> <td><%= build.early_items %></td> <td><%= build.core_items %></td> <td><%= build.situational_items %></td> </tr> <% end %>
Here is the github repo: https://github.com/imjp/DotA-Items
Basically, what I want to do is to be able to enter the id of an item in my form that later on gets displayed as the item name.
I’m not even sure if the name starting_items is the best for this, or if i should just use
item_id
. Because I’m planning on adding a lot of different inputs where users can enter items that need to be displayed as names.
Do you think the namestarting_items
is good for one of the fields, or should I useitem_id
?Isn’t there a way I can display the name of an item with ruby by doing something like
Item.name.find(build.starting_items)
or something? Since thestarting_items
value is anitem_id
?-
why would you want to do this?
-
@davr: the pc has xp on it for 5 years, but is getting dead slow (no surprise, I’ve never encountered a system running XP for so long), so a reinstall of XP is necessary anyway. Was wondering if Win7 wouldn’t be a good option if I had to the the reinstall anyway…
-
«Was wondering if Win7 wouldn’t be a good option if I had to the the reinstall anyway». not on this system, it wouldn’t. stick to XP or upgrade the system memory to 2 GB, RAM is cheap.
-
Try adding:
<td><%= p build.inspect %></td>
and<td><%= p build.hero.inspect %></td>
and show us the output for one of the build objects -
Also — in your question you are saying you can’t get the name for an item, but the code is for builds… have you given us the correct code?
-
I’ve added the github repo as well.
-
-
«I don’t think you can install with less than 1GB of memory» no problem to install Windows 7 on a system with only 512 MB.
-
Must of just been Vista then — I will retest a bit later — just remember a warning stating that the machine does not have enough memory.
-
not sure bout Vista’s requirement now, XP won’t install on 64 MB or less, which can be circumvented, e.g. via nLite («disable minimum memory requirement»)
-
+1 for suggesting the Update Advisor (which I didn’t see at first).
-
just testing with a 32-bit Ultimate DVD in VBox, Windows starts fine with 256 MB, no dice with any lower settings though
-
«Starts with» is not the same as workable and usable… And, just tested in a VM, 512MB is the smallest size setup allows — i49.tinypic.com/jqg5zr.jpg
-
you can install if it doesn’t meet the requirement. All windows installer will do is just give you a warning
-
What do you mean by anything else? In my case, anything else would be Word, Excel and Picasa. I think that is about it.
-
Hey thanks for replying Steve. However, I do not have an array that is being returned or anything. I think I should have
item_id
as the column name instead ofsituational_items
,starting_items
and so forth. I’m going to post the github project so you can take a look. -
Can you elaborate on what the methods situational_items and starting_items actually are. The fact they were plural just made me assume they were arrays.
-
I’m still very new to rails: this is my first app, so some things might not have been done correctly by me. The columns
situational_items
andstarting_items
are not methods, they’re just strings. I just realized I need to change those to integers to see if that will help. -
I have posted another answer. I will remove this answer assuming the other one is along the right lines.
-
I’ve changed the
starting_items
, etc. fromstring
tointeger
because even though it is SUPPOSED to generate select boxes filled with content — emphasis on supposed because the select boxes aren’t working. darn you formtastic! — the value of this will be an ID just like it does inactive_admin
. I’m going to change the habtm in my model and get back to you. -
Thanks for answering Taryn. I tried placing the code you’ve provided but I get a
nomethoderror: undefined method
map’ for #<Item:0x8126430>` -
Being new to rails and programming in general makes it somewhat hard to communicate for me due to the fact that I just don’t know the majority of the terms.
-
Basically, what I want to do is to be able to enter the id of an item in my form that later on gets displayed as the item name. I’m not even sure if the name starting_items is the best for this, or if i should just use
item_id
. Because I’m planning on adding a lot of different inputs where users can enter items that need to be displayed as names. Do you think the namestarting_items
is good for one of the fields, or should I useitem_id
? Isn’t there a way I can display the name of an item with ruby by doing something likeItem.name.find(build.starting_items)
or something? -
Basically, what I want to do is to be able to enter the id of an item in my form that later on gets displayed as the item name. I’m not even sure if the name starting_items is the best for this, or if i should just use
item_id
. Because I’m planning on adding a lot of different inputs where users can enter items that need to be displayed as names. Do you think the namestarting_items
is good for one of the fields, or should I useitem_id
? Isn’t there a way I can display the name of an item with ruby by doing something likeItem.name.find(build.starting_items)
or something? -
As i said — you’ll need to add basic checks. In this case, you’re getting the «undefined method» error because you only passed a single id, and thus it wasn’t returned as an array. You should probably add a check for : «if build.starting_items.length < 1» or just force it to be an array eg «Item.find([build.starting_items].compact)» …
-
As to whether it’s a good idea… that’s another question entirely. It seems to work — you just have to actually turn them into real Items before trying to call methods on them
-
Thank you for getting back to me. Unfortunately, I don’t know how to add basic checks. Seems like Chinese to me. I’m going to dig into some Rails books.
-
By «basic checks» I mean basic error and edge-case detection eg «if starting_items.present?» and «if (item = Item.find(build.starting_items)).present?» etc. I have actually given you the correct answer… it’s now up to you to write the actual code with correct error checking. Can you please accept my answer?
Recents
#21
Отправлено 09 Декабрь 2009 — 14:22
QuietSergey
-
- Участники
-
- 42 сообщений
Участник
Лучше конечно проверить винт таки…
Посмотри в сторону Hiren Boot CD. В нём есть Victoria. Эта программа просканирует и по-возможности исправит HDD, если с ним что-то не так. Информации в интернете по пользованию этой программой или диском достаточно.
И, диск с 7ёрочкой — таки всё равно в нём нет уверенности.
- Наверх
#22
planter
Отправлено 11 Декабрь 2009 — 07:09
planter
-
- Участники
-
- 10 сообщений
Читатель
Я первым делом попробовал поставить Windows7 на комп шестилетней давности.
AMD Athlon™XP2500+ ~1.83MHz/мать JetWay N2PAPLITE /GeForce FX 5200/ 1Гб ОЗУ/80Гб/ LG F700B.
Windows7 Ultimate встала сразу без проблем, ещё и дровишки сама нашла свежие.
А потом уже поставил Windows7 Ultimate на ноутбук, Acer 5520G /AMDTurion64 TL60/GeForce8600M GS с 512Мб/2048 и тоже без проблем
Сообщение отредактировал planter: 11 Декабрь 2009 — 07:12
Windows7(32bit)Acer 5520G /AMDTurion64 TL60/GeForce8600M GS/2048
- Наверх
#23
Mykola
Отправлено 11 Декабрь 2009 — 12:29
Mykola
-
- Участники
-
- 1 сообщений
Читатель
Я так понимаю, на мой комп AMD Athlon™64 Processor 3000+ 1?81 Ггц, 1,0 Гб ОЗУ «Семерка» должна встать без проблем?!
- Наверх
#24
ss8
Отправлено 11 Декабрь 2009 — 17:53
ss8
-
- Участники
-
- 146 сообщений
Advanced Member
Я так понимаю, на мой комп AMD Athlon™64 Processor 3000+ 1?81 Ггц, 1,0 Гб ОЗУ «Семерка» должна встать без проблем?!
Именно так
- Наверх
#25
Аскет
Отправлено 13 Декабрь 2009 — 07:41
Аскет
-
- Участники
-
- 121 сообщений
Advanced Member
внимание!!! по поводу установки Вин7 на компы ПЕНЬ3 и подобной архитектуры! Ошибка Загрузчика там «winload» — ПРИЧИНА ядро вин7 откомпелировано под архитектуру выше (современее) чем ПЕНЬ3.
вот весь ответ! если процессор поддерживает НАВЕРНОЕ от пень4 и точно ВЫШЕ тогда Вынь7 будет и должна работать
просто порыться в мануалах нужно минимальная архитектура, и будет точно известно с каких процов её можно впихнуть, а с каких только ХР или Вынь98 или ВыньМЕ
- Наверх
#26
QuietSergey
Отправлено 13 Декабрь 2009 — 17:07
QuietSergey
-
- Участники
-
- 42 сообщений
Участник
Видно не ко всем П3 относится ) цель633 поднялась нормально, ошибок не было. сборку ставил офф 7600 рус 32 бита.
- Наверх
#27
evpu
Отправлено 16 Декабрь 2009 — 08:39
evpu
-
- Участники
-
- 15 сообщений
Читатель
Стояли 2 планки DDR1 по 256мб, семерка встала(P4 2.4ГГц). Затем, одну планку заменил на 128мб. Запустилось. С тормозами, но запустилось.
Ставил на 512мб DDR2 на чипсете с интегрированной графикой(сколько графика оттяпывала — не смотрел…), Celer (LGA775). Даже интерфейс AERO работал. Но — тормозило, конечно…
Сообщение отредактировал evpu: 16 Декабрь 2009 — 08:41
- Наверх
#28
ss8
Отправлено 02 Январь 2010 — 13:37
ss8
-
- Участники
-
- 146 сообщений
Advanced Member
АП
Семёрка встала на бук Samsung R40 Celeron M 1,73 MHz, 1Gb RAM 60Gb HDD
летает, хотя ОЗУ доступная 894 Мб
- Наверх
#29
atrel
Отправлено 02 Январь 2010 — 20:59
atrel
-
- Участники
-
- 20 сообщений
Участник
Планирую поставить на комп:
VIA Embedded EPIA-ML CPU VIA 667MHz HDD250 IDE жду когда 512 Mb DDR 1 ОЗУ принесут — буду пытаться воткнутьА кому на какую рухлядь удавалось воткнуть 7?
celeron 433
256 dimm
мать не помню
riva tnt объем не помню
20 гигов винт
Небыло проблем, начал в 3D рисовать…
- Наверх
#30
acd94
Отправлено 07 Январь 2010 — 15:55
acd94
-
- Участники
-
- 11 сообщений
Читатель
Попробую поставить на:
AMD Sempron™ 2800+ 2.00 Ггц, 1,25 ГБ ОЗУ, Radeon 9600 126 мб, 120 гб хард.
Как думаете, встанет? И сильно будет лагать? Понятное дело, ХРюша летает норм))
- Наверх
#31
ss8
Отправлено 20 Январь 2010 — 20:59
ss8
-
- Участники
-
- 146 сообщений
Advanced Member
Попробую поставить на:
AMD Sempron™ 2800+ 2.00 Ггц, 1,25 ГБ ОЗУ, Radeon 9600 126 мб, 120 гб хард.
Как думаете, встанет? И сильно будет лагать? Понятное дело, ХРюша летает норм))
Встанет
Летать будет
- Наверх
#32
drshrek
Отправлено 22 Январь 2010 — 11:10
drshrek
-
- Участники
-
- 1 сообщений
Читатель
Отлично работает, хоть и не летает на ноут MSI 1314: VIA C7-m 1.6 ггц, 960 ОЗУ, VIA Chrome9 HC IGP Famili
- Наверх
#33
vikrorpert
Отправлено 22 Январь 2010 — 12:16
vikrorpert
-
- Участники
-
- 9 сообщений
Читатель
celeron 433
256 dimm
мать не помню
riva tnt объем не помню
20 гигов винт
и не тормозит?
- Наверх
#34
Alexandr1981
Отправлено 22 Январь 2010 — 14:29
Alexandr1981
-
- Участники
-
- 332 сообщений
SUPER Member
celeron 433
256 dimm
мать не помню
riva tnt объем не помню
20 гигов винт
как интересно она встала туда, если для работы семере надо 400мб оперативы?
- Наверх
#35
lomlom76
Отправлено 22 Январь 2010 — 20:01
lomlom76
-
- Участники
-
- 1 сообщений
Читатель
На ноут fujitsu-simens amilo A1650
AMD mobile Sempron2000+ (2.0 MHz хотя эверест писал 800MHz)
512 Mb оперативы 60 гиг вин
встала только после обновления биоса до писала чтото вроде (Виос не поддерживает… обновите)
А на ноут acer aspire 1703 pentium4 512mb 20Gb по той же причине не встает а биос обноаление не поддерживает
- Наверх
#36
samsung911
Отправлено 27 Январь 2010 — 15:28
samsung911
-
- Участники
-
- 1 сообщений
Читатель
Ставил Win 7 Ultimate на PIII 850 / SDRAM 384 / ATI 9600 SE / HDD 20. При настройке на максимальную производительность — убирает все «рюшики» и работает очень шустро. Субъективно, так же как XP. Медиа центр — тормозит конечно. А офис, почта, Opera — без проблем.
- Наверх
#37
ss8
Отправлено 27 Январь 2010 — 19:40
ss8
-
- Участники
-
- 146 сообщений
Advanced Member
Буду ставить на P4 2.8 ГГц 512 ОЗУ видео GF 4 MX 440
отпишусь
- Наверх
#38
Anatf
Отправлено 27 Январь 2010 — 20:48
Anatf
-
- Участники
-
- 534 сообщений
SUPER Member
Ставил Висту и Семёрку на ПК с видеокартой с памятью 32 Мб. Видеокарта Matrox Millen., эта видеокарта быпа в первой тестовой версии Висты и устанавливалась при инсталляции Висты. Компанией Microsoft указанная видеокарта классифицируется как профессиональная (для работы).
- Наверх
#39
atrel
Отправлено 29 Январь 2010 — 14:16
atrel
-
- Участники
-
- 20 сообщений
Участник
как интересно она встала туда, если для работы семере надо 400мб оперативы?
если полностью функционировала ХР на 96 метрах то 7ка на 128 ставить комфортно при минимуме 256
но при 128 тоже ничего
при том что ранее МХ440 и 5500, 5200 7ка вылетала в бсод, то сегодня скачал бета дрова с офф сайта и вуаля все чикичики
после этого 7ка нашла обновления и докачала и обновила дрова на видео
вин 7 максимальная
установил уже на 37 компов ставил как 64 бит так и 32 особо понравилась работа 7ки на атлоне и с тв тюнерами особых проблем нету только надо дрова подкачивать с офф сайтов
гениус усб проверенно работает на ура
только я его под вентилятор поместил так как он греется и комп виснет замертво….
еть опыт установки так же и на ноуты
всех конфигураций не упомню но если кому помочь советом пожалуйста
Небыло проблем, начал в 3D рисовать…
- Наверх
#40
ss8
Отправлено 31 Январь 2010 — 21:35
ss8
-
- Участники
-
- 146 сообщений
Advanced Member
Буду ставить на P4 2.8 ГГц 512 ОЗУ видео GF 4 MX 440
отпишусь
с флэшки ставится ОООООООООООООООООчень долго 5 часов — видать USB 2.0 там всё-таки нету
пишу болванку
- Наверх